Welcome to this very first PEP Talk*. I plan for PEP Talks to be an ongoing series of indefinite length about online publishing for the masses. My interest, what I mean with "masses", is in reaching everyone, everywhere, no matter how tenuous someone's connectivity.
My focus is publishing technology, not content: audience-focused publishing tech.
Books have been written, (programming) languages and frameworks developed, for and by those who implement the technologies used in online publishing. Those people also typically have access to extremely reliable and fast internet connections, and the skills and means to circumvent restrictions on their internet connectivity.
Lets look at those restrictions for a second, and identify two reasons for no or low connectivity: (1) lack of affordable access to the internet, and (2) censorship restricts access to the open internet.
Access and affordability
In 2025, 99.4% of the world population had an active mobile broadband connection. This worldwide indicator hides regional disparities. In the Americas, there were 132 mobile broadband connections per 100 people compared to 55.6 in Africa. High income earners had on average 160 active subscriptions compared to just 49 for low income earners.
The ITU considers internet connectivity as 'affordable' when the cost does not exceed 2% of monthly income. Worldwide this is true only for high-income earners and, since 2025, for "upper-middle-income" earners as well. Low income earners worldwide, continue to pay as much as 10% of their gross income on internet connectivity.
Reliable internet access is further hampered by regular (electric, mobile phone) outages, and preferential treatment of certain network traffic over other (net neutrality).
— Sources: ITU DataHub, ITU data on "Active mobile broadband subscriptions", ITU "Facts & Figures 2025: Measuring digital development", including "Affordability of ICT services"
Censorship and shutdowns
While concerns around internet access and affordability are on the decline, internet censorship is on the rise. According to Freedom House, 2025 saw internet freedom decline around the world for the 15th year in a row.
In some ways, censorship is the polar opposite to access an affordability, it is the wilful restriction of access to some (online) content, platforms and services. At the far end of the scale, authorities restrict access to all online platforms and services when imposing an internet shutdown.
In 2024, Access Now tracked 296 internet shutdowns in 54 countries, up from 78 shutdowns in 27 countries a short decade before.
Freedom House tracks internet freedom and access controls in 72 countries. In 2025, the organization labeled 18 of these as "free". The 18 "free" countries represent less than 20% of the world population. People living in the remaining 54 countries experience moderate to severe internet censorship, including "obstacles to access", "limits on content", and "violations of user rights".
In some of the most egregious cases, authorities censor access to all but desirable content ("propaganda") by way of platform and service whitelisting, or restrict bandwidth to the open internet to a trickle, thereby making most platforms and services all but unusable.
— Sources: Freedom House's "Freedom on the Net 2025" report, Access Now's "Lives on hold: internet shutdowns in 2024" report
So, where does that leave us?
- Access and affordability While broadband internet connectivity is very widespread in 2025, disparities in access to and affordability of broadband internet connections between regions and socioeconomic groups remain.
- Censorship and shutdowns Whereas we're quickly leaving disparities in access behind in the rear-view mirror, the incidence of network censorship and internet shutdowns is rising quickly around the world.
The internet is instrumental in the delivery of news and information people need to make life choices, lead their daily lives, be politically, economically and culturally active, and generally be an active member of society. But the developers of apps and sites that people use to consume the news, often have internet connections that are nothing like those of the audiences for those apps and sites.
Apps and sites are often tested only on the fastest of internet connections. The internet is like air, connectivity like breathing, "always on", an afterthought. Rarely do developers consider the user experience of sites or apps when connectivity is expensive, reduced to a trickle, or the online world switches off entirely.
Let that sink in for a minute. If you publish an app or site, but do not actively consider situations of no or low connectivity, then you are likely to actively push "solutions" that hamper the reach and resilience of your content.
Unless you're a publisher that develops content for the lucky few—those with copious amounts of bandwidth providing unfettered access to all of the global internet—you should really be considering the affordability of your audiences' internet access, and the restrictions on access imposed by (government) censors.
The choices we make, as publishers and developers, affect the availability of content, the reach and resilience of the platforms we shape with our decisions.
So let's make better decision!
In my next PEP Talks
- Small payload, big performance—Modern, performant websites are resilient websites.
- Feature detection all the way down—Treat everything as a feature, even connectivity and the internet.
- Progressively Enhanced Publishing—Publish with the worst case in mind, then upgrade your content.
(*) My colleagues and business partners, Joris and Sudeshna—both are all-round more technology savvy than I am, and much more in touch with what the #userneeds—have strongly advised against explaining my reasons for calling these "PEP Talks". You'll think me a nerd (I am) or you'll think I like making linguistic jokes at the expense of my audience (I do). If you have an inclination of my reasons for calling these PEP Talks, let me know in the comments.
PEP Talk #1: Web standards for better publishing
The choices we make, as publishers and developers, affect the availability of content, the reach and resilience of the platforms we shape with our decisions. So let's make better decision!